mkon's Profile - Buypass AS

Latest Posts

Re: When using ACME.sh to apply for a certificate, the verification fails
Our dns fails to resolve the domain on that attempt. Is this still an issue?
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- Questions
- Reported - view
Re: Get http bad request from ACME API
@Fredrik Melby Very nice. Added a changelog for upcoming updates here: https://community.buypass.com/t/60y86wy/changelog
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- Questions
- Reported - view
Changelog

03.09.2024 - Added support for ARI https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-ari/
- QA
- mkon
- updated 1 yr ago
- 624
- 1
- Technical Information
Re: Get http bad request from ACME API
@Fredrik Melby Yes, that's a good point. I will investigate the error message further. We should have had a more descriptive message. We need a changelog up and running on the community,…
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- 1
- Questions
- Reported - view
Re: Get http bad request from ACME API
@Fredrik Melby We did one change, being more strict with the user-agent the client is sending. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8555#section-6.1 If this is not the case,…
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- Questions
- Reported - view
Re: Get http bad request from ACME API
@Fredrik Melby Hi. Do you get an 400 error on every function? Or is it f.ex fetching the certificate that is the issue?
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- Questions
- Reported - view
Important information about revocation

Be aware that there might occur situations where Buypass must revoke your certificate on short notice. The deadline for revoking is defined by requirements we are obliged to follow and will be within…
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- 237
- Tips, Tricks and Guides
Re: Applying Certificate - IIS
Not experienced that myself. Maybe check with FAQ for the client you use?
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- Questions
- Reported - view
Re: DNS validation currently broken?
@Steven Haigh Can`t see any issues on rate limits, if you use the same account. But it seems to be some timeout issues somewhere. If you hit a rate limit issue,…
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- Questions
- Reported - view
Re: DNS validation currently broken?
@Steven Haigh Great that it works. Tried checking responses from your domain yesterday, but it all seemed ok. Today i actually see that one nameserver does not reply. Weird case
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- Questions
- Reported - view
Re: generic questions about mentioned crt issue
@Karoly Attila We had some issues again. Could you try now. Please add -debug option to acme.sh, and add correlationID
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- 2
- Questions
- Reported - view
Re: 500 Error with Certbot Certonly
We had some issues, could you please try again?
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- Questions
- Reported - view
Re: Urgent message to renew certificates issued before Dec 22 but renewal not working
@Bryce Chidester We had some issues. Could you try again.
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- Questions
- Reported - view
Re: DNS validation currently broken?
From our logs, it seems we cant find the txt record
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- Questions
- Reported - view
Re: generic questions about mentioned crt issue
Hi, please try again now.
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- 1
- Questions
- Reported - view
Re: Unexpected Behavior in DNS Challenge Generation with Certbot Command
Hi. If it`s still an issue with this, could you contact customer service with more details. Domains etc. support@buypass.com
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- Questions
- Reported - view
Re: DNS validation currently broken?
@Steven Haigh Hi. Could you please try again now?
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- Questions
- Reported - view
Re: Urgent message to renew certificates issued before Dec 22 but renewal not working
Hi. We have adjusted some logging. Could you please try again?
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- Questions
- Reported - view
Important information that requires immediate action.

Please renew your Buypass ACME (Go SSL) certificates issued before December 22 12:00, 2023. We have identified an issue within our systems so that these certificates do not comply with certificate…
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- 1379
- Technical Information
Re: Due to maintenance the GO SSL ACME solution is down
Maintenance is finished. Service is up.
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- Technical Information
- Reported - view
Due to maintenance the GO SSL ACME solution is down
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- 1reply
- 400
- Technical Information
Re: ACME-CAA?
We do not support acme-caa at this time.
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- Questions
- Reported - view
Re: Future features
@Steven Haigh Yes, but i have no timeframe right now.
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- 2
- Discussion
- Reported - view
Re: Validation of IPv6 only server
Thank you for the request. We are aware of this limitation - we intend to also support IPv6 only systems. This change is identified, but not yet scheduled.
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- 2
- Questions
- Reported - view
Re: Future features
@Steven Haigh Thank you for the request. We will consider adding support for the topics in your request and will come back with more information later.
- QA
- mkon
- 1 yr ago
- Discussion
- Reported - view

1 2 3

Community

mkon

Re: When using ACME.sh to apply for a certificate, the verification fails

Re: Get http bad request from ACME API

Changelog

Re: Get http bad request from ACME API

Re: Get http bad request from ACME API

Re: Get http bad request from ACME API

Important information about revocation

Re: Applying Certificate - IIS

Re: DNS validation currently broken?

Re: DNS validation currently broken?

Re: generic questions about mentioned crt issue

Re: 500 Error with Certbot Certonly

Re: Urgent message to renew certificates issued before Dec 22 but renewal not working

Re: DNS validation currently broken?

Re: generic questions about mentioned crt issue

Re: Unexpected Behavior in DNS Challenge Generation with Certbot Command

Re: DNS validation currently broken?

Re: Urgent message to renew certificates issued before Dec 22 but renewal not working

Important information that requires immediate action.

Re: Due to maintenance the GO SSL ACME solution is down

Due to maintenance the GO SSL ACME solution is down

Re: ACME-CAA?

Re: Future features

Re: Validation of IPv6 only server

Re: Future features

Home